In Depth Comparison of PPS-CF10 and PA6-CF10: Material Behavior, Performance, and Application Considerations

Polyphenylene Sulfide (PPS) and Polyamide 6 (PA6) are both high performance thermoplastics widely used in engineering applications. While PA6 is known for its flexibility, toughness, and ease of processing, PPS is valued for its superior thermal stability, chemical resistance, and dimensional accuracy.

To enhance mechanical performance, both materials are often reinforced with 10% carbon fiber, resulting in PPS-CF10 and PA6-CF10. Though the carbon fiber content is the same, the base polymer fundamentally changes their behavior, performance, and suitable applications.

This article presents a detailed comparison of PPS-CF10 and PA6-CF10 in terms of mechanical properties, processing, thermal resistance, and cost performance balance.

1. What Are PPS-CF10 and PA6-CF10?

PPS-CF10: A high performance thermoplastic matrix made of PPS reinforced with 10% short carbon fiber by weight.

PA6-CF10: A modified Polyamide 6 material, also reinforced with 10% short carbon fiber.

While both use chopped carbon fiber to increase strength and stiffness, the polymer matrix behavior dictates how the composite performs in terms of temperature resistance, chemical exposure, and long term dimensional stability.

2. Key Property Comparison

3. Mechanical Performance Insights

PA6-CF10 performs well under mechanical loads at room temperature but loses strength and stiffness when exposed to heat or humidity due to moisture absorption.

PPS-CF10, on the other hand, maintains mechanical integrity even at elevated temperatures and offers superior chemical resistance. Its stiffness and creep resistance make it suitable for applications requiring tight tolerances over long term use.

4. Processing and Manufacturing Differences

Note: PPS requires high temperature resistant molds and precise temperature control during processing. It is also more abrasive to tooling due to both the polymer and fiber.

5. Surface Finish and Aesthetic Considerations

PA6-CF10 usually results in a smoother surface finish, especially when well processed.

PPS-CF10 may lead to matte or slightly rougher surfaces, but surface finish is not typically a concern in its industrial applications.

6. Application Suitability

PA6-CF10 is commonly used for:

Automotive interior brackets

Consumer electronics housings

Power tool enclosures

Light-duty structural parts needing moderate strength and cost efficiency

PPS-CF10 is ideal for:

Automotive under the hood components (e.g., sensors, pump housings)

Electrical and electronic parts requiring flame resistance

Chemical processing equipment

Precision parts exposed to high heat, solvents, or mechanical load

7. Cost and Value Considerations

PA6-CF10 is much more cost effective, easier to mold, and readily available—making it the preferred choice for moderate performance applications.

PPS-CF10 comes with a higher material and processing cost but offers superior performance in harsh environments where PA6 would degrade or fail.

8. Summary: Which Should You Choose?

9. Conclusion

While both PPS-CF10 and PA6-CF10 are 10% carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastics, they are optimized for very different environments:

PA6-CF10 offers good mechanical performance, aesthetic finish, and low cost for general purpose or moderate temperature use.

PPS-CF10 excels in high temperature, chemically aggressive, or dimensionally critical environments—though at higher material and processing cost.

Choosing between them depends on the specific thermal, chemical, mechanical, and environmental requirements of your application.

If you want to get more information about PA66-CF or PA66-LCF, you can vist our Youtube.